They don’t allow their citizens free access to the internet.
Simple as that, there is no mincing of words on this issue.
Totalitarian regimes have found out that the worst opposition they could
possibly have is a well informed, well educated population. It functions much in
the same way religions work…keeping their adherents immersed so deeply in their
religion that they can’t access any other idea or information outside of their
hermetically sealed environment. It works.
It is no secret that both government tyrannies and religious
absolutists will repress with cruel brutality any kind of dissent…that is what makes these tyrannies
so ruthless. They know that the only way they can survive is by keeping the
public ignorant and disengaged.
We see how the Republicans embrace both the concept of
religiosity as a virtue because the more extreme brand of religious fanaticism
keeps women ignorant, barefoot and pregnant and the men unable to think for themselves.
The Republicans are more than elated to have America watching “Dancing With the
Stars” or “American Idol” or even entertaining them with a circus like
atmosphere as the Republican Presidential primaries have been.
You see, while people are watching these shows their
attention is not on how voters are being disenfranchised, how the horrible
inequality in the distribution of wealth and power, how corporations can
dictate who gets elected and are elevated to the status of personhood.
We are not just endangering the democratic process by this
Citizen’s United Supreme Court abominable decision but now we are being
threatened with the possibility of internet censorship. That is what it comes
down to and it is not going to work because most Americans are too aware of the
Republican tactics and how they resemble those of countries like North Korea,
Cuba and Iran.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FORMER SPEAKER GINGRICH PUT ON AN ACT INDICATING HE WAS INDIGNANT ABOUT A QUESTION ABOUT HIS ADULTEROUS AFFAIR.
How dare you a journalist of
your stature ask such a question from me?
How could you
possible ask such an outrageous question from me, “I’m appalled that you would
begin a Presidential debate with a question like that” “vicious, negative” the
former Speaker of the House answer to the journalist, the defender of family
values, condemnation of homosexuality and the role model for all American men?
I am beyond reproach, well above the scrutiny you low life reporters are
hurling at me? It is an insult, an outrage…after all; he was part of the
condemnation of President Clinton’s impeachment attempt for his adulterous blow
job.
We should
bring it to the attention that Speaker Gingrich was forced out of the House of
Representatives Speakership for his unethical dealings and it culminated in an
official House vote to reprimand Gingrich and a $300,000 bill to reimburse the
committee's investigation, are a matter of public record.
Somebody ought to remind Newt that it is the American people who are indignant to see such hypocrisy coming from a Presidential contender.




Just heard Reince Priebus, Chairman of the RNC in an interview say "when voters finally realize what President Obama has done to this country...." This is laughable! As if what Bush/Cheney did was nothing! These people are delusional. I heard a hilarious description of Gingrich the other day as Sidney Greenstreet. LOL!
ReplyDelete