What happens when two equally matched hot dudes meet? Here are two guys who are very successful, very good looking and hung. Their dicks are exactly the same size. Both have bubble butts and love to get fucked but end up being tops because of the size of their dicks.
Their paths cross…Richard de Orizaba and Paco Prado
Our two protagonists’ paths cross and they finally meet and the sparks flied. Paco is a good fifteen years older than Richie. But Paco is now a veteran of porn films and owns a chain of health and fitness centers throughout the country. Richard is a young journalist who comes from a very wealthy south Texas Mexican American family.
Richie is a member of Paco Fitness in Houston. There he gets to meet other young men who are fit and attractive. This is one of the places that has cruisy locker rooms and very active shower areas where there is a lot of homosexual activity.
One weekday in the afternoon, Richie went through his workout routine and when he finished he headed for the showers. Paco had come to Houston to oversee the new operations of the Fitness Center. He did his work out and noticed Richie in the treadmill and thought he was a very attractive guy.
When they both finished working out, it was simultaneous bee line to the locker room.
Richie started to undress, off went his tennis shoes, then his top, and then his work out pants. He was left in his jock strap and Paco was at the other end but did not miss one move. Paco was also undressing slowly and by this time it was clear they were both cruising each other. The erections grew. It was not necessary to hide them now. They both knew that each was looking at the other. Paco then lowered his jock strap, very slowly and the humongus cock popped out. Richie did the same and his gigantic dick sprung like a slinky. They were equally matched in the cock department. Who had the biggest schlong? Did it even matter? Surely if these two got together in a bed it would certainly be for a big, flip flop session. After all, both were versatile, enjoyed getting fucked as much as playing top. They also had one fetish in common: they were armpit fanatics only they had not found out yet.
Richie and Paco were in the showers. There were others there too and it seemed that they all had hard ons and were all cruising each other and both Paco and Richie.
Then Richie, looking at Paco’s monumental dick remembered that this was one familiar cock. It
dawned on him that this could possibly be the dick that belonged to this porn star in one of the videos he had often jerked off watching. Yes, that is it, this is this porn star named Paco. He is up there with the likes of Holmes and other biggies. Richie could not bring himself to believe that it was Paco the porn star. But he started to think: age wise, Paco should be in his forties by now. Yes, that is it. This is Paco for sure.
“Hi, I see you have one big mother fucking cock just like me” said Paco. “I’m Richie, I guess you are right”. “and I am Paco”. “I suspected that was you. I think I own one of your movies” said Richie. “It is so incredible the distance you shoot your wad, and the quantity…you cum buckets!” Richie told Paco. “Would you like to take this somewhere a little more private?” Paco asked. Richie then invited him to his house on the bayou.
“Oh my God, that is one of the biggest dicks I ever had up my ass” said Richie (remembering Han’s which was still by far the largest) and Paco was saying: “Oh, Richie, you have the tightest ass, yes, it is incredible. It is like fucking velvet. Yeah, do that, squeeze my dick with your ass, milk it” And Richie was starting to feel one of his anal orgasms. It happened. After so many years it finally happened again. Richie was cumming in the front without touching himself and having spasms and contractions only like those a
woman has when reaching an orgasm and that was unusual too. But Richie begged Paco to take his dick out and have him cum in his mouth. Paco only said that he will do it if Richie agrees to fuck him next. There you have it. This was one uninterrupted flip flop, fuck session.
What is and isn't attractive...Is beauty in the eyes of the beholder?
Seriously, we have to re-examine as a society our views on what is attractive and what is not. It seems that the fashion industry has hijacked the ability to dictate this for us. A lot of the fashion gurus who dominate this genre are telling us that these anorexic, super smooth scrawny twinks are the “ideal” male and that is the accepted standard of beauty for the males and females too. Nothing could be further from the truth. The reality is that these models are all agonizing over their weight and constantly trying to keep their bodies hairless and will go to any lengths to get it done.
We as a species have certain traits that are prevalent; one of those is the male of the species has often an abundance of body hair. Instead of celebrating this feature and learning to appreciate it, we have totally rejected it and adopted a rather unhealthy and unnatural model. Pretty much has to be said for the hygine practices in our western culture. We think that the smell of a male is offensive. We avoid it and have learned to find it repulsive when in reality it is just the opposite. Nature meant for the male and the female of the species to exude a certain amount of odors.
The sex hormones of the male follow a much simpler pattern than do those of the female, although the same principle of interaction exists
between the pituitary gland
and the gonads. The latter organs, the testes, secrete steroids called androgens, which are responsible for the maintenance of male characteristics and behavior. FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone) from the pituitary gland stimulates the growth of the seminiferous tubules that constitute much of the structure of the testes and promotes within them the cell divisions that result in the production of mature sperm. LH (luteinizing hormone) from the pituitary gland promotes the development within the testes of endocrine tissue, which is composed of groups of cells (interstitial tissue) between the
seminiferous tubules. The interstitial tissue of certain bony fishes, however, is represented by cells, called lobule boundary cells, situated within the tubule tissue.
Under the influence of LH (often called ICSH, or interstitial-cell-stimulating hormone, in males), the interstitial tissue secretes the steroid hormone testosterone, which is the most important vertebrate androgen. The fact that it is an intermediate compound in the metabolic pathway of estrogen synthesis accounts for the origin of some forms of abnormal sexual organization in man; for example, the testes may secrete predominantly estrogen instead of androgen, resulting in markedly female appearance and behaviour in a male. Although testosterone may be secreted by the adrenal cortex, occasionally producing sexual disturbances, the amount of secretion is not normally significant.
Testosterone, which is bound to a protein as it circulates in human blood, can be converted to the compound (androstenedione) from which it is formed, especially in the liver and in muscle; both compounds are metabolized, mainly in the liver, to substances that are excreted in urine. Very small quantities of testosterone can also be excreted in urine, and the quantities of testosterone and compounds derived from it frequently are measured to provide an index of testicular condition.
In addition to promoting male characteristics, male behaviour, and the maintenance of the spermatic tubules, testosterone, in the presence of normal amounts of growth hormone, also promotes growth of the bony skeleton. The reason for rapid growth at puberty is that the secretion of androgen markedly increases. The hormone brings about the closure of the epiphyses (ends) of the long bones, which completes the process of growth (estrogens have a similar action in the female). Thus, as often occurs among animals, growth ceases before full reproductive activity is attained, and competition between two processes, both of which make heavy demands upon the resources of the body, is avoided.
About Circumcition, THEY WORSHIP THE PHALLUS IN JAPAN
I wish somebody could tell me what this obsession Americans have with circumcising the cock is. It is a horrible practice. It mutilates the male member and it is very cruel and painful to the infant, yes, it does cause a lot of pain even if he baby can’t tell us. There are many consequences to this practice, the least of which is the diminish sensitivity while copulating and also the psychological castration that men suffer. The excuse that it is done for hygiene purposes is all a bunch of bull. Yes, if one does not wash an uncut cock often you might get smell or even smegma, but if you teach a child to pull back the skin and wash regularly there should not be any unwanted smell. The real reason behind circumcision is religious. The Jews have been doing it for thousands of years and while it was a sensible practice three thousand years ago when they were nomads living in the dessert where water was scarce, nowadays it is not as relevant.
We are a dysfunctional society
We might as well come to terms with this. We are, as a nation one of the most dysfunctional societies that have ever become a world power. We see throughout history that those who rose to prominence were for the most part very homogeneous and had a general purpose; be it war, be it survival, be it economic or military domination. But these previous countries/states were able to get to that position of prominence because of their homogeneity not in spite of it.
The United States of America is an anachronism, a contradiction, an unlikely candidate for success. We are plagued with disagreement and acrid antagonism. The very concepts we embrace so dear, such as is the one for freedom of speech and the press, causes this disagreement to be even more volatile.
When we set out to become a nation, the concepts the Founding Fathers had in mind to build a fair and prosperous nation were in place and distinctly clear as they even described them and put them into writing: it is called the Constitution.
But as imperfect as these men were, and as unfair the whole society was at the time; the spirit of a democratic type of society began to emerge. Mind you,
the original signatories to the Constitution were only those who were educated and wealthy, thus making our roots more elitist and out of the reach of those who did not have either a place in society like women and other races, or were not wealthy enough to be able to participate in the democratic process as the Founding Fathers limited this right to those who were white landowners.
These very men, who conceptualized a society that was fair to all and looked upon all its citizens as equals, also had very clear and concise ideas as to what role religion should play in this new society and it was simply this: NONE. The Founding Fathers were very specific in the participation of religion in government and they provided the foundations for what we now prize and adhere to: THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE.
But what is most impressive about this great social experiment of ours we call a Democratic Republic is that it is still working after existing for more than two hundred years. In spite of a lack of homogeneity, in the absence of conformity this nation has prospered and is thriving. I think that it is clear that what feeds the dreams, what fuels the fire of freedom, what nourishes the concept of equality and democracy is our diversity. As long as we continue to celebrate it, as long as we respect each other and honor the right to be different, we are going to continue to be America; the America for all, not the America for WASPHs. Notice I added an H at the end because it is now White-Anglo-Saxon-Protestant-Heterosexual to those elements that are always trying to undermine the concept of democracy.
It is because our diversity that we have become a great nation rather than in spite of it. We view “the melting pot” concept as a positive, at least most Americans do. We value our spirit of innovation and our propensity for individualism. Some of us are vigilant and always fighting to defend this concept and we are not without opposition. These very conformists, the so called Conservatives have brought us mediocrity and some of the worst elected officials in our political history, people like the incompetent George W. Bush and the charismatic airhead Sarah Palin. America has more than its share of idiots, xenophobes and homophobes but that makes our struggle even nobler.
I also know that some will accuse me of just repeating the talking points that the “liberal media” is putting out. But believe me when I tell you that I don’t adhere to “selective reasoning”. I try to read all I can from the Conservatives, including books written by Bill O’Reilly and I am in the mailing list of several Conservative organizations. Sometimes if makes me sick to the stomach to read the crap they put out. As for Sarah Palin, I do listen to what she says; I cling to every word and to every thought in my attempt to find any vestiges of intelligence.
Being a Conservative means to me that you want to maintain the status quo, you don’t like change and when I look around and see there are hundreds of things that not just need changing, they are screaming for reform then it negates any legitimacy that conservatism has.
Invade the Cayman Islands? What a stupid thing to say
I was watching Joe Scarborough this morning and he was saying that he spoke to an immigrant from India and the man said that he didn’t understand how America did not produce anything. Joe was saying that manufacturing had declined and we had become a service economy.
Whose fault is that? Blame can be applied to many on both sides but I can’t help to think of how the darling of Republicans; President Reagan encouraged this type of activity by giving corporations all kinds of incentives, tax breaks and even subsidies to close shop and take their manufacturing else where abroad. Not happy with just doing that, he also made it very attractive for companies doing business in America to take
their corporate headquarters abroad to avoid paying their fair share of taxes.
One such place is the Cayman Islands. There are thousands of corporations that even in name only have their headquarters located there. Other places offer with their complicity a secure place to store away their wealth. Some of this treasure was ill-gotten, some of it is even the remnants of our 401K and pensions.
We invaded Iraq and it was a country that didn’t attack us, didn’t hide billions of dollars away from our government to avoid taxes and yet we have spent billions and billions in conducting an unnecessary war. The Cayman Islands have rendered us more harm than Iraq ever did and still hides away all these scoundrel’s operations with full complicity. Another is Switzerland. So, should we invade them? Of course not, but we can go after all these companies that are playing dirty with our country.
PHOTO SOURCE: http://images.encarta.msn.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment